Partner
Serial/Series Title
Country
States
Decade
Month
Language
915 Matching Results
Results open in a new window/tab.
Results:
1 - 24 of
915
next
Praecipe for subpoena for Mabel Allen vs. Continential Insurance Company of New York
Praecipe for case number 16,013 Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York. Includes court date of March 31, 1922.
Date:
March 20, 1922
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Printed database of cases filed
Database compiled of all cases of property damage from the Tulsa Race Massacre. Includes names, addresses, case numbers, a list of property loss.
Date:
unknown
Creator:
Tulsa Race Riot (Massacre) Commission
Object Type:
Text
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for insurance companies to appear in court in case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
Date:
June 1, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court for case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
Date:
June 1, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court for case number 23395 Shakespeare Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
Date:
June 8, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Order of dismissal for case 23339 Rev. Jas. A. Johnson et al., vs City of Tulsa, et al.,
Date:
July 6, 1937
Creator:
Williams, Bradford J.
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Reverend James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Dismissal of case 23339 Rev. Jas. A. Johnson et al., vs City of Tulsa, et al.,
Date:
June 30, 1937
Creator:
Scott, Elisha
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection filed stating that the Johnsons have not brought a sufficient complaint to move against the defendant J.M. Adkinson.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection filed stating that the Johnsons do not have a sufficient complaint to bring against O.A. Steener.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint against U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection filed by C.S. Younkman stating that the Johnson's do not have sufficient facts to bring the complaint against the defendant.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Demurrer James and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint to move against the National Surety Company.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection filed stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint to the defendant H.F. Newblock.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection stating that the Johnsons did not bring a sufficient complaint against Geo H. Blaine.
Date:
July 14, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Objection by the National Surety Company stating that the James A. Johnson did not bring a sufficient complaint to move against the company. Lists out the reasons.
Date:
November 9, 1925
Creator:
Breckwelder and Bostick
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Petition naming the City of Tulsa, various employees, and the National Surety Company as being complicit in the destruction of the property owned by the Johnson's.
Date:
May 31, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for several employees of the city of Tulsa and various insurance companies to appear in court for case number 23339 James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
Date:
May 31, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
James A. Johnson and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for employees of the city of Tulsa and insurance companies to appear in court for case number 23339 James A. and Fanny Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
Date:
June 1, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for several city of Tulsa employees for case number 23317 Emmett Johnson vs. the City of Tulsa for property damage.
Date:
May 31, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons of several city of Tulsa employees to appear in court in case number 23317 Emmet Johnson vs. City of Tulsa.
Date:
June 8, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for employees from insurance companies to appear in court in case number 23317 Emmett Johnson vs. City of Tulsa
Date:
June 5, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Application to advance cause for Mabel Allen vs. Continental Insurance Company of New York
Application to send the suit to trial quickly. Continental Insurance Company quotes their riot clause as reason for not paying on the insurance policy.
Date:
January 6, 1922
Creator:
Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Answer to the petition of Mabel Allen by the Continental Insurance Company
Answer to the petition of Mabel Allen to sue for funds from an insurance policy held by the Continental Insurance Company.
Date:
unknown
Creator:
Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History
Summons in the case of Sarah Andrews vs. City of Tulsa
Summons for several Tulsa city employees and the state insurance commissioner. The summons also mentions several insurance companies
Date:
May 31, 1923
Creator:
District Court of Tulsa
Object Type:
Legal Document
System:
The Gateway to Oklahoma History