Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO98-012 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO98-012

Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: City's use of noncivil service personnel for fire frighting duties at NASCAR race track.
Date: February 20, 1998
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO98-067 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO98-067

Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a justice of the peace must deposit the fee collected under Transportation Code section 543.106 with the county treasury, and related questions (RQ-992)
Date: August 20, 1998
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO90-63 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO90-63

Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Jim Mattox, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification.
Date: September 20, 1990
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO90-93 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO90-93

Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Jim Mattox, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification.
Date: November 20, 1990
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-013 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-013

Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the state treasury is prohibited by statute or constitutional provision from purchasing any security priced above market value and whether the state is prohibited from guaranteeing the investments of other governmental subdivision (ID# 30971)
Date: February 20, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-236 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-236

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the City of Austin has the authority to enact an ordinance prohibiting random drug testing by private employers within the city (RQ-526)
Date: July 20, 1993
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-245 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-245

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether defendants in criminal cases may be required to reimburse a county for the cost of employing interpreters, and related questions (RQ-236)
Date: August 20, 1993
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-265 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-265

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the annual distribution of extra interest by the Texas County and District Retirement System to annuitants violates article III, section 52 of the Texas Constitution (RQ-569)
Date: October 20, 1993
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-277 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-277

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether complaints under V.T.C.S. article 249a, section 13, may be tried in justice courts as class C misdemeanors (RQ-215)
Date: December 20, 1993
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-278 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-278

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Dallas County Schools, a county school administration operating under chapters 17 and 18 of the Education Code, is a “school district” within the meaning of Education Code section 21.939, which places restrictions on lobby-related activities by school districts (RQ-610)
Date: December 20, 1993
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-285 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-285

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: What court is the proper forum for prosecutions brought under House Bill 1084, Acts 1993, 73d Leg., ch. 88, at 175-76 (RQ-629)
Date: January 20, 1994
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-366 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-366

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a duly recorded abstract of a valid, nondormant, and undischarged judgement may constitute (1) a cloud on the judgement debtor's title to homestead property located in the county where the abstract is recorded and (2) a slander of the judgement debtor's homestead title.
Date: December 20, 1995
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: JC-82 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: JC-82

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John Cornyn, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a commissioners court may purchase fire-fighting equipment for or pay a volunteer fire department without having contracted with the volunteer fire department to provide fire-protection services for county residents.
Date: July 20, 1999
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: JC-83 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: JC-83

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John Cornyn, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a county judge may conduct an inquest when the appropriate justice of the peace is unavailable to do so (RQ-0010)
Date: July 20, 1999
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-25 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-25

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Meaning of the "locality in which the work is performed" for purposes of article 5159a, V. T. C. S., the prevailing wage statute, and related questions (RQ-2189)
Date: May 20, 1991
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-45 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-45

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the amendment to article 42-18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the mandatory time that inmates must serve prior to eligibility for parole is retroactive (RQ-65)
Date: September 20, 1991
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-46 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-46

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Texas nepotism law, article 5996a, V.T.C.S., is violated when the superintendent of a Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation school awards a merit salary to his spouse, who is employed at the same facility (RQ-110)
Date: September 20, 1991
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-106 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-106

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether services of auctioneers are "professional services" for purposes of laws governing the awarding of contracts by cities and counties, and related questions (RQ-152)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-107 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-107

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Harris County Attorney is authorized to represent a Harris County Hospital District employee accused of criminal acts committed within the course of his duties, and whether the hospital district is authorized to hire an attorney to represent such an employee or to reimburse the employee's legal expenses following the conclusion of the litigation (RQ-291)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-108 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-108

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether rule B11(c) of the Rules and Regulations of the Smith County Bail Bond Board which prohibits an original bail bond applicant from executing deeds of trust in property as security for obligations incurred in the bonding business is invalid as inconsistent with article 2372p-3, V.T.C.S. (RQ-205)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-109 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-109

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a constitutional county judge is disqualified from presiding over probate proceedings involving wills that he prepared or witnessed and related questions (RQ-48)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-110 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-110

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether section 11(b) of the Texas Boxing and Wrestling Act, V.T.C.S. article 8501-1, applies to cable television companies collection pay-per-view fees from subscribers viewing live telecasts of professional boxing performances (RQ-208)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-111 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-111

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the county sheriff or the county commissioners court has the authority to choose a physician and schedule the physician to provide medical services to inmates incarcerated in the county jails (RQ-247)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-112 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-112

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: The legality of "casino night" fundraising by nonprofit organizations (RQ-284)
Date: April 20, 1992
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Object Type: Text
System: The Portal to Texas History