Abstract: A limited study of the compound U₃Si₂ has been made in reference to its use as a prospective nuclear fuel in sodium cooled reactors.

None

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Compensation of County Judge of Harris County.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: May the State Highway Commission, under authority of Article 6673a, V.C.S., sell surplus land improvements to the County of Maverick for the established value without requesting sealed bids from the general public, when the intended use to be made of the property by the County of Maverick is for another public use viz, county roads warehouse.

None

None

This report, for June 1965 from the chemical Processing Department at HAPO, discusses the following: Production operation; Purex and Redox operation; Finished products operation; maintenance; Financial operations; facilities engineering; research; and employee relations.

None

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Proper distribution for inheritance tax purposes of the estate of Lena Dishart Cohen under submitted facts.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a prisoner convicted and fined in more than one misdemeanor case, in laying out the fines in jail, is entitled to receive credit on each case at the rate of $3.00 per day simultaneously.

This report addresses the buckling tests of scaled graphite barrel inner reflectors.

None

This report provides the status of production test control tube loadings in reactor process tubes containing significant amounts of SS materials.

None

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Constitutionality of Senate Bill 163, Acts 59th Legislature, 1965, the “Economic Opportunity Act of 1964.”

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a county may legally acquire, maintain and operate a translator system in order to provide television for entertainment and educational purposes for the citizens of the county, if the qualified voters of the county petition the Commissioners’ Court to call an election for a bond issue and special tax levy for the purpose of securing, maintaining and operating the said translator system.

None

None

This monthly report details reactor and materials technology activities during the month of June 1965.

None

None

None

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Commissioners Court of Garza County may close the doors and cease operating Garza Memorial Hospital and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a corporation court has jurisdiction on a complaint charging theft of personal property of the value of $5.00 or under, where such property is stolen from a retail establishment under conditions defined by Article 1436e, V.P.C. (The Shoplifting Statute)