Department of Defense Clearinghouse Response: DoD Clearinghouse response to a letter from the BRAC Commission requesting comment on the closure of Fort Monmouth.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group(IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Letters from Eve Harwell and Logan Knight to the BRAC Commission in response to the recommendation to realign the 186th Air Refueling Wing in Meridian, Mississippi.

Letter from Antonio Monroig to Anthony Principi regarding the disestablishment of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). Monroig argues in favor of the AFIP remaining open.

Letter from Susan Nichols and Kathy Calabrese to the Base Realignment and Closure Commission regarding its recommendations towards Fort Huachuca. Nichols and Calabrese insist that BRAC has made an error in its assessments and include information to that effect.

Hard copy and CD of Presentation prepared by the Guam Chamber of Commerce and The Guam Economic Development and Commerce Authority - GUAM- America's Presence with a Purpose in Asia Deterrence not Provocation

Executive Correspondence - Letter from Connecticut Governor Rell and Connecticut Representatives to the Commission regarding the Pentagon's proposal to strip the 103rd Fighter Wing of their A-10 Warthogs

Executive Correspondence - Letter from California Legislators: Fabian Nunez Speaker of the CA Assembly, Don Perata, Senate President pro Tempore and Senate Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy and Dick Ackerman regarding the CA Regional Hearings

Base Visit Trip Report to Eglin Air Force Base by the BRAC Commission Analysts

Base Visit Trip Report to Dyess Air Force Base on 27 June 2005

Base Visit Report of the BRAC Commission Visit to Fort Sam Houston, Texas dated 11 July 2005

Report of Visit to Umatilla Chemical Depot in Oregon by Commissioners Coyle and Bilbray

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum - Minutes of the Infrastructure Evaluation Group (IEG). Including meeting agenda, a report, and any other additional information from the meeting.

Memorandum of meeting regarding a briefing and tour of the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), VA.

Memorandum of Meeting with Naval Air Depot Cherry Point staff to close out the BRAC visit to Cherry Point.

Letters from Stephen G. Hearn to members of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (BRAC) in support of Cannon Air Force Base in Clovis, New Mexico.

A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for ensuring that federal agencies have access to the telecommunications needed to meet mission requirements. GSA's current telecommunications program, called FTS2001, has contracts in place that will expire by June 2010. Thus, agencies face the difficult task of transitioning their services to a successor program, known as Networx. GAO was asked to determine (1) the extent to which agencies are following sound transition planning practices and (2) the actions GSA is taking to identify and resolve common transition challenges affecting agencies. In performing this work, GAO selected six agencies based on, among other things, their FTS2001 charges; reviewed transition planning at these agencies and GSA; and analyzed GSA documentation of actions to address transition challenges."

A statement of record issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "The federal government will spend approximately $11 billion to combat terrorism In fiscal year 2001. In the event of a domestic terrorist incident, state and local governments have the primary responsibility for managing the consequences of a terrorist attack. However, the federal government can assist state and local authorities if they lack the capability to respond adequately. On the basis of past and ongoing GAO work, two key issues emerge that the new President and Congress will face concerning programs to combat terrorism. First, the overall leadership and management of such programs are fragmented within the federal government. No single entity acts as the federal government's top official accountable to both the President and Congress. Fragmentation exists in both coordination of domestic preparedness programs and in efforts to develop a national strategy. The Department of Justice worked with other agencies to develop the Attorney General's Five-Year Interagency Counterterrorism and Technology Crime Plan. Although this plan is the current document that most resembles a national strategy, GAO believes that it still lacks some critical elements including measurable desired outcomes, linkage to resources, and a discussion of …