From abstract: "This report describes the Aerial Radiological Measuring System (ARMS-II) operated by EG&G, Inc., for the Division of Biology and Medicine, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission."

Shipment of radioactive wastes in shielded transfer casks is a continuing practice between the 300 Area and the 200 Areas. However, the Waste Solidification Engineering Prototypes (WSEP) located in 324 Building, 300 Area, require the transfer of significant quantities of radioactive wastes. Two new 30-ton casks are being placed in service to accommodate the increased number of shipments. The purpose of this report is to document the design criteria, tests and calculations performed on the casks and modifications to the original cask design to insure its safe use. The design criteria was developed in January 1963 by an ad hoc committee comprised of representatives of the Chemical Processing Department, Hanford Laboratories, and Construction Engineering and Utilities of General Electric Company. The various tests, calculations and modifications of the cask were conducted by the Chemistry Department of Pacific Northwest Laboratory.

Biweekly, comprehensive compilation of decisions, reports, public notices, and other documents of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.

As a result of an AEC directive, a review has been made of the disposal of chemicals to the Columbia River by 100-N to determine if any water pollution hazards exist. The search revealed that no chemicals are released continuously in hazardous concentrations; that three cases exist where hazardous concentrations might be released intermittently under worst-case conditions; that two cases exist where intermittent releases result in questionable conditions; and that two cases exist where accidental release from storage might result in hazardous conditions. Recommendations for corrective action are given in all cases.

This report, from the Chemical Processing Department at HAPO for February 1966, discusses the following: Production operation; Purex and Redox operation; Finished products operation; maintenance; Financial operations; facilities engineering; research; and employee relations.

This report gives an analysis of the audit data obtained during the last half of 1965 at eight transfer stations: L9 plutonium product, K6 uranium product, F15 salt waste, D5 dissolved feed, F18 utility waste, G8 organic wash waste, R8 organic wash waste, and U3 laboratory waste. Two ways of improving the Purex quality control program are described.

Shipment of radioactive wastes in shielded transfer casks is a continuing practice between the 300 Area and the 200 Areas. However, the Waste Solidification Engineering Prototypes (WSEP) located in 324 Building, 300 Area, require the transfer of significant quantities of radioactive wastes. Two new 30-ton casks are being placed in service to accommodate the increased number of shipments. The purpose of this report is to document the design criteria, tests and calculations performed on the casks and modifications to the original cask design to insure its safe use. The design criteria was developed in January 1963 by an ad hoc committee comprised of representatives of the Chemical Processing Department, Hanford Laboratories, and Construction Engineering and Utilities of General Electric Company. The various tests, calculations and modifications of the cask were conducted by the Chemistry Department of Pacific Northwest Laboratory.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Questions relative to election of county school trustees when the boundaries of certain precincts have been changed by the Commissioners Court.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Payment of dividends from earned surplus.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether certain policies applicable to the creation and perpetuation of school sponsored departmental, social and special interest clubs by interested students are valid when reviewed in the light of Article 301d, V.P.C.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Under the facts stated, whether the Commissioners Court of Jasper County may form an airport district which would only include two precincts and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a jury free should be paid in a juvenile case before a jury is allowed any party, and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Questions relating to the civil and criminal enforcement of support orders, and Article 2328b-4, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, Acts 59th Legislature, 1965, Ch. 679, page 1561, the new Texas Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a corporation court may legally tax costs in a criminal case.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the County Attorney of Matagorda County, Texas, has the duty to act under the new Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether an appropriation could be made for the payment of certain witness fees, if the claims therefor are not filed in the Comptroller’s Office within twelve months from the date they became due, under the provisions of Article 35.27, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure, and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: The meaning of the word “default” as used in Section 2 of Article 17.11 of the 1966 Code of Criminal procedure.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: What the words “each day” mean as used in Article 26.05, Sec. 1(a) of the new Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: When a barber school changes ownership, necessitating the drawing up of a new contract, whether the new owner can be required to bring the school up to the requirements as outlined in Section 9, H.B. 829, Acts 57th Legislature, 1961, and related question.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Responsibility for the cost of operating the Harris County Convalescent Ward.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Proper lists for the selection of qualified jurors.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether an officer, by virtue of a valid search warrant issued to search for a stolen TV set, also finds a typewriter which had been reported stolen at another time, may legally take possession of the typewriter and related questions; and construction of Article 42.13, C.C.P., relative to the stated facts.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether contracts between the Governor’s Committee on Aging and certain enumerated entities can be legally entered into for the purposes stated.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Construction of Sections 148 and 149 of Article 6701d, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, in reference to whether the new Code of Criminal Procedure would prevent the prosecution for failure to appear in a traffic violation.