Letter from J. Andrews to W. J. Bryan following up on a letter that Mr. Bryan sent and sending regards to Mr. Bryan's family.

Letter from Walter S. Pope to Honorable W. J. Bryan discussing the details of the joint debate of Wagstaff and L. A. Brooks regarding the Ball and Furgerson race.

Letter from E. G. Mitchell to W. J. Bryan sharing his reaction to he previous letter Mr. Bryan sent, reminiscing about their old days at Texas A&M, explaining his previous activities and providing information about his family.

Letter from W. H. Garnett to W. J. Bryan informing him that he is excited to meet his son and explaining the reasons why he was unable to respond to his previous letter in a timely manner. Garnett also informs Mr. Bryan that he has a wife now and would be glad to introduce her and sends best wishes to Mrs. W. J. Bryan.

Letter to Honorable W. J. Bryan thanking him for the Christmas letter he sent and sending regards from the family to Mr. Bryan.

Letter from R. W. Hedges to Senator W. J. Bryan thanking him for a letter he sent and apologizing for not responding earlier. Mr. hedges shares his past experiences seeking a employment and sends regards to Mr. Bryan's family members.

Letter from E. K. Capeton to Mr. Wheeler discussing the death of Capeton's mare, which was killed by one of J. H. Parramore's bulls, and seeking financial compensation from the San Simon Cattle and Canal Company for his loss.

Letter from J. J. Wheeler to J. H. Parramore discussing the death of a mare belonging to E. K. Capeton that was said to have been killed by one of Parramore's bulls in Tom Barker's pasture. Wheeler states that Capeton had the mare in the pasture without Barker's consent and that the death occurred at night with no witnesses, thus claiming the company should not have to reimburse Capeton for his loss.

Letter from E. K. Capeton to J. H. Parramore discussing the death of Capeton's mare, which was killed by a bull belonging to Parramore in Mr. Barker's pasture. Capeton writes seeking out monetary compensation for the loss of his mare and to dispute an accusation made by Mr. Wheeler that he had placed the mare in Mr. Barker's pasture without consent.

Letter from J. D. Jordon to J. H. Parramore discussing water producing holes that have been drilled on the Cienega lands and their conditions.

Letter from John H. Page to James Harrison Parramore discussing legal advice on company stockholder meetings.

Letter from J. P. Alvey to Henry Sayles discussing a credit placed on Henry Sayles Jr.'s note and discusses when both notes are due.

Letter from M. McAlpine to Mac Sayles discussing selling their ranch and asks Mac what he thinks of it. McAlpine also mentions talking to a potential buyer for the land.

Letter from Sayles, Sayles, & Sayles to W. B. Carrington discussing that Mary Sayles has received notice of a creditors meeting. Sayles says she will not file for bankruptcy but they would like to be notified if any orders arise regarding payment of her note.

Letter from Ed. S. Hughes to Henry Sayles stating he is attending a hearing before the U. S. Government Engineers and asks that Sayles hold his part from the land sale.

Letter from Henry Sayles requesting advice on delinquent tax suits to discover if it is believed he owes delinquent taxes.

Letter from W. B. Carrington to Henry Sayles Jr. discussing a bankruptcy filed by W. J. Burditt and a note he assumed from Sayles' mother, executed by N. G. Johnson Jr.

Letter from R. L. Barrett to Henry Sayles discussing the need for a list of all land that Sayles owns in order to procure an exact list of taxes he may be delinquent on.

Letter from J. P. Alvey to Henry Sayles confirming receipt of the interest payment on a $4,000 note.

Letter from Madden, Trulove and Kimbrough to Henry Sayles discussing a client who has owned 5,000 acres for about fifteen years. This property was earlier ordered to be retained by executors of the deed and given to Emily B. Gillespie and Mary E. Sayles as inheritance. The conveyance of the land by Gillespie, Sayles and Sayles' husband John is objected as it is uncertain whether Gillespie and Sayles are the only heirs to the land. It was also objected due to clerical error. The writers ask for as much information as possible about the land.