Current service statement from West Publishing Company to John J. Herrera reflecting a balance of $607.40 for charges described as Texas cases and code.

Installment statement from West Publishing Company to John J. Herrera reflecting a balance of $183.29.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John L. Hill, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether election on annexation to hospital district may be held within three months of election defeating similar proposal.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Authority of the Attorney General and local governments to institute legal action based solely on a violation of Texas Air Control Board rules, regulations, variances or orders.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Authority of Texas Education Agency to consider damages as part of administrative appeal of a teacher discharged by a local school district.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department may exchange its negotiable coupon bonds with the low bidder for such bonds, for land owned by the low bidder.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Travel, allowance and per diem for members of the American Revolution Bicentennial Commission of Texas.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Authority of the office of Governor to provide direct planning assistance through its own staff to Texas communities.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a mother may be promoted to tax assessor-collector of a school district when her son is a member of the board of such district without violating Article 432, Vernon’s Penal Code.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Questions regarding laying out of service areas by the Coordinating Board and annexation of territory to a junior college district under the provisions of Acts 1969, 61st Legislature, Chapter 788 (Chapter 2815h-1b, V.C.S.)

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Article 802f, Penal Code, and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Several Questions concerning filing and adjudication of claims under the Water Rights Adjudication Act of 1967 (Art. 7542a, V.C.S.).

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Are the Game Management Officers of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department authorized under Article 1722a, Vernon’s Penal Code, to enforce a certain Resolution of a County Commissioners Court?

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Do the installers and operators of the city’s sky ride hold taxable leasehold interest in real property or a mere operating agreement or license not taxable?

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether Section 3-b of Article VII of the Texas Constitution, as amended in 1966, obviates the necessity to hold an election in independent school districts where there has been a change in the boundaries by annexation or consolidation to determine whether the resultant district shall assume any outstanding bonds as well as levy bond and maintenance taxes therein. Whether Section 16.80(e) of the Texas Education Code (Acts 61st Leg., R.S. 1969, ch. 889, p.2709) requires that an election beheld for the assumption of outstanding bonds, if any, and the levying of bond and maintenance taxes as an incident to any consolidation effected under the provisions of subsection (a) of Section 16.80, supra.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether office holders, such as judges, may simultaneously hold office on the boards of regents of State institutions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether county funds may be expended for the purchase of land for a regional correctional facility, and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John L. Hill, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a corporation is criminally liable for operating child-caring or child-placing institution without license, Subsection 12, § 8a, Art. 695c, V.T.C.S.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John L. Hill, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Texas Water Quality Board can delegate its authority to inspect and certify boats to private business.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John L. Hill, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Deposit of the Second Injury Fund in interest bearing accounts.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, John L. Hill, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Effect of veto of appropriation for Board of County and District Road Indebtedness.

Memorandum addressed to Captain T. D. Tolleson of the Intelligence Division in Dallas, Texas. The memorandum states that an individual called the office and said that Joe Linthicum was seen drinking at a bar. At the time, Joe Linthicum said that he had worked for Jack Ruby for eight years.