Resource Type
Collection
Degree Department
6 Matching Results
Results open in a new window/tab.
Results:
1 - 6 of
6
Re-engineering Ethics: Pushing Philosophy Outside of its Comfort Zone at the APPE Annual Meeting
This article discusses ethics and pushing philosophy outside of its comfort zone at the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics (APPE) annual meeting.
Date:
March 27, 2013
Creator:
Barr, Kelli R. & Lu, Wenlong
System:
The UNT Digital Library
Broader Impacts 2.0: Seeing- and Seizing- the Opportunity
Article discussing viewpoints on the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Merit Review Broader Impacts Criterion and the emergence of Broader Impacts 2.0.
Date:
March 2013
Creator:
Frodeman, Robert; Holbrook, J. Britt; Bourexis, Patricia S.; Cook, Susan B.; Diederick, Laura & Tankersley, Richard A.
System:
The UNT Digital Library
Good Transformations: Ambiguity and the NSF's Experiment with 'Transformative' Research
This article discusses a recent workshop on Transformative Research held at the headquarters of the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) in Arlington, Virginia.
Date:
March 22, 2012
Creator:
Holbrook, J. Britt; Barr, Kelli R. & Frodeman, Robert
System:
The UNT Digital Library
Resistance to impact criteria can lead to a tightening of the accountability noose
Article discussing research on how the resistance to impact criteria can lead to a tightening of the accountability noose.
Date:
March 15, 2012
Creator:
Holbrook, J. Britt & Frodeman, Robert
System:
The UNT Digital Library
Integrating Ecology and Environmental Ethics: Earth Stewardship in the Southern End of the Americas
This article discusses integrating ecology and environmental ethics.
Date:
March 2012
Creator:
Rozzi, Ricardo, 1960-; Armesto, Juan J., 1953-; GutiƩrrez, Julio R., 1953-; Massardo, Francisca; Likens, Gene E., 1935-; Anderson, Christopher B. et al.
System:
The UNT Digital Library
Science: For Science's or Society's Sake? Owning the National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion
Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it.
Date:
March 1, 2012
Creator:
Holbrook, J. Britt & Frodeman, Robert
System:
The UNT Digital Library