State Input from South Texas Military Complex's to the BRAC Commission (open access)

State Input from South Texas Military Complex's to the BRAC Commission

Regional Hearing - State Input from South Texas Military Complex's to the BRAC Commission. Includes a powerpoint and a CD/DVD.
Date: July 14, 2005
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Text
System: The UNT Digital Library
State Input from Willow Grove Air Reserve Station to the BRAC Commission (open access)

State Input from Willow Grove Air Reserve Station to the BRAC Commission

Regional Hearing - State Input from Willow Grove Air Reserve Station to the BRAC Commission. Includes a powerpoint and any other additional information.
Date: July 14, 2005
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Text
System: The UNT Digital Library
Student Loan Forgiveness Programs (open access)

Student Loan Forgiveness Programs

None
Date: July 14, 2006
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Report
System: The UNT Digital Library
SUPREME COURT OPINIONS OCTOBER 1997 TERM (open access)

SUPREME COURT OPINIONS OCTOBER 1997 TERM

None
Date: July 14, 1998
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Report
System: The UNT Digital Library
Trenton ICES. Volume I. Phase I, final report (open access)

Trenton ICES. Volume I. Phase I, final report

Phase I Preliminary Design and Evaluation for a Grid Connected Thermally Controlled Integrated Community Energy System (ICES) for Trenton, New Jersey has been carried out. The findings of the study are that: it is technically feasible, utilizing commercially available hardware; it is economically competitive with conventional alternatives for heating and cooling buildings; it will produce an overall reduction in fuel consumed of 32 to 43% when compared with conventional alternatives for heating and cooling buildings; it will consume 4 to 9% more oil than will conventional alternatives for heating and cooling buildings; it should be owned and operated by Public Service Electric and Gas Co. (PSE and G); and it can provide thermal energy 21 months after the start of Phase II and electrical energy 32 months after the start of Phase II. This study is site-specific and of a small-size project. Its installation will not alter the planned PSE and G capacity expansion program. The economic evaluation results of the report cannot be extrapolated for numerous co-generation installations that would affect the PSE and G planned capacity-expansion program.
Date: July 14, 1977
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Report
System: The UNT Digital Library
The U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED): Economic Outcomes and Issues (open access)

The U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED): Economic Outcomes and Issues

None
Date: July 14, 2015
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Report
System: The UNT Digital Library
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General report on audit of acquisition of scientific research at Ames Laboratory (open access)

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General report on audit of acquisition of scientific research at Ames Laboratory

The Department awards grants and cooperative agreements and contracts to sponsor scientific research at colleges and universities. Compared to cooperative agreements, contracts, particularly management and operating contracts, often impose duplicative and/or unnecessary administrative and compliance burdens on a college or university. Since the Department bears the cost of those additional burdens, the authors audited the cost effectiveness of the Department`s sponsorship of research at Ames Laboratory under a management and operating contract with Iowa State University. The research conducted at Ames is of the type that Congress intended to be sponsored by assistance agreements, rather than contracts. Moreover, they found the contract for managing and operating Ames Laboratory caused micromanagement and unnecessary costs, most of which could have been avoided with a cooperative agreement. However, after completion of the field work, the Department announced initiatives to reduce or eliminate some compliance and oversight burdens associated with management and operating contracts, but did not opt to sponsor research under cooperative agreements. The authors are unable to determine the monetary impact because the initiatives have not been implemented. Nevertheless, they continue to believe that cooperative agreements, having fewer unique bureaucratic requirements, offer the potential for reducing administrative overhead.
Date: July 14, 1995
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Report
System: The UNT Digital Library
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014: Comparison of Select Provisions (open access)

Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014: Comparison of Select Provisions

None
Date: July 14, 2014
Creator: unknown
Object Type: Report
System: The UNT Digital Library