This report talks about Bibliography, SNAP program reports, memo's, TDR's, and motion pictures, January 1, 1966--September 30, 1967

This document details activities of the Mound Laboratory Isotopic Power Fuels Program during the months of April, May, and June 1967.

The average grain size of salt-water and induction-oil heat-treated cores received during the period August 1, 1966 through November 31, 1966, was unchanged and was between A-6 and A-7. The combined visual and grain size reject rate of bare cores was 0.23 percent for the period September 1, 1966 through December 15, 1966. Five 03N fuel cores from ingot Z-64295 were rejected by the UT-2 testers as large-grain rejects. When the cores were manually retested, tester signals indicated that areas of small grains were mixed unhomogeneously in a matrix of large grains. This phenomenon is though to be either (1) a segregation of chemistry in the ingot or rod and/or (2) heat transfer from the core when it was quenched. Studies are being conducted to determine the cause of such a phenomenon. Pictures of the core and core cross-sectional area, Figures 1 and 2, show that there are areas of small grains (A-6) surrounded by large grains (A-2).

This document shows the status of production test control tube loadings (at Hanford) in reactor process tubes containing significant amounts of SS materials. This information is entirely numerical and is presented in the form of computer printouts. For additional information on the column headings and the current discharge goal plan, refer to document DUN-1048.

This report gives the status of production test control tube loadings in reactor process tubes containing significant amounts of SS materials. The data are in table form. For further description of column headings and the current discharge goal exposure plan refer to Document DUN-1048.

None

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Applicability of Oil Production Tax on Tank Bottoms

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; May the Texas Water Development Fund be used to provide financial assistance for construction of recreational facilities which are proposed in conjunction with a municipal dam and reservoir project?

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Construction of Article 2898, Vernon's Civil Statutes and Article 2338-1, Vernon's Civil Statutes.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification;Use of bond proceeds.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Constitutionality of Senate Bill 255, as amended.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Telephone charges of members of the House of Representatives.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the County Attorney of Bee County, and the District-Attorney serving said county are required to submit the reports contemplated by Arts. 1001-1005, C. C. P., Arts. 390-391, P. C. and Art. 1620, V. C. S.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether under the Texas Election Code a County Tax Assessor-Collector, acting in his capacity as the registrar of voters in his county, is authorized to accept applications for voter registration certificates mailed or delivered to him by someone other than the applicants themselves or the husband, wife, father, mother, son, or daughter of an applicant.