Resource Type
Partner
Collection
Serial/Series Title
10 Matching Results
Results open in a new window/tab.
Results:
1 - 10 of
10
[Letter from John Sayles to M. B. Wilhoit, December 3, 1932]
Letter from John Sayles to M. B. Wilhoit endorsing the inclusion of forms. Sayles does not want to do the extra work of preparing forms but believes they would add value to the book. Sayles is reluctant to undertake a work with which he knows he will be dissatisfied and states he does not approve of all of Stayton's forms.
Date:
December 3, 1932
Creator:
Sayles, John
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from W. R. McPherson to James W. Hunt]
A letter from W. R. McPherson of Pendleton, Texas, to James W. Hunt, dated November 3, 1932. The letter alleges a conspiracy by supporters of former Texas Governor James Ferguson and his wife to damage Hunt's reputation in retaliation for Hunt's comments about the Fergusons during a recent radio program.
Date:
November 3, 1932
Creator:
McPherson, W. R.
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from R. Osthoff to H. Studtmann, October 3, 1932]
Letter from R. Osthoff to H. Studtmann regarding a faculty member named Neeb.
Date:
October 3, 1932
Creator:
Osthoff, R.
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from Perry Sayles to Standard Savings and Loan Association, August 3, 1932]
Letter from Perry Sayles to Standard Savings and Loan Association discussing arrangements to be made on a property to avoid foreclosure.
Date:
August 3, 1932
Creator:
Sayles, Perry
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 3, 1932]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company case. The plea of privilege has not yet been filed.
Date:
June 3, 1932
Creator:
Sayles, John
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from David W. Stephens to Belle Wellborn, May 3,1932]
Letter from David W. Stephens to Belle Wellborn in regards to the Sam Underwood vs Gulf Refining Company. Mr. Stephens ask for Miss Wellborn to issue citations to N. E. Fielding on the Gulf Refining Company's original answer and cross-action.
Date:
May 3, 1932
Creator:
Stephens, David W.
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens, May 3, 1932]
Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens discussing the court cases, Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company in both the county and districts courts.
Date:
May 3, 1932
Creator:
unknown
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from John Sayles to M. S. Long, May 3,1932]
Letter from John Sayles to M. S. Long discussing a form that sustains the plea that N. E. Fielding is a necessary party defendant in the case. John Sayles had been previously contacted to move the case of Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company to the 104th distract court in which David W. Stephens is in agreement with.
Date:
May 3, 1932
Creator:
Sayles, John
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel, May 3, 1932]
Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel discussing the Sam Underwood vs. Gulf Refining Company case. Sayles states the case has been dismissed and N. E. Fielding is not required to appear. The Gulf Refining Company has taken a nonsuit.
Date:
May 3, 1932
Creator:
Sayles, John
System:
The Portal to Texas History
[Letter from T. H. Neel to Sayles & Sayles, May 3, 1932]
Letter from T. H. Neel to Sayles & Sayles asking if it is necessary for N. E. Fielding to appear for the Sam Underwood vs. Gulf Refining Company case.
Date:
May 3, 1932
Creator:
Neel, T. H.
System:
The Portal to Texas History