Work in this quarter focused on the continued running of two SIMVAL cases: {phi} (equivalence ratio) of (1) 0.55 and (2) 0.625. Comparisons were made between RANS and LES predictions for the {phi} of 0.625 case. The LES calculation showed a different flow pattern in the combustor compared to the RANS calculation, in particular the combustor recirculation flow pattern on the centerline is dramatically different. To demonstrate that the LES solution is accurate (and the RANS is not), non-reacting cases based on the Lilley experiment (Lilley, 1985) were run. Results from the Lilley cases verified that the LES calculations more closely match experimental velocity measurements for highly swirled, turbulent flows with a downstream constriction. In particular, RANS predictions show a strong centerline recirculation zone in the combustor, while LES predictions show positive axial velocity on the centerline, and an annular recirculation zone around the centerline. Animation files were also created this quarter, so as to better demonstrate the LES predictions.