The problem of this study was to determine the differences in experimentwise and comparisonwise Type I error rate among six multiple comparison procedures when applied to twenty-eight combinations of normally distributed data. These were the Least Significant Difference, the Fisher-protected Least Significant Difference, the Student Newman-Keuls Test, the Duncan Multiple Range Test, the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference, and the Scheffe Significant Difference. The Spjøtvoll-Stoline and Tukey—Kramer HSD modifications were used for unequal n conditions. A Monte Carlo simulation was used for twenty-eight combinations of k and n. The scores were normally distributed (µ=100; σ=10). Specified multiple comparison procedures were applied under two conditions: (a) all experiments and (b) experiments in which the F-ratio was significant (0.05). Error counts were maintained over 1000 repetitions. The FLSD held experimentwise Type I error rate to nominal alpha for the complete null hypothesis. The FLSD was more sensitive to sample mean differences than the HSD while protecting against experimentwise error. The unprotected LSD was the only procedure to yield comparisonwise Type I error rate at nominal alpha. The SNK and MRT error rates fell between the FLSD and HSD rates. The SSD error rate was the most conservative. Use of the harmonic mean of …

This study compared three methods of detecting test item bias, the chi-square approach, the transformed item difficulties approach, and the Linn-Harnish three-parameter item response approach which is the only Item Response Theory (IRT) method that can be utilized with minority samples relatively small in size. The items on two tests which measured writing and reading skills were examined for evidence of sex and ethnic bias. Eight sets of samples, four from each test, were randomly selected from the population (N=7287) of sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students enrolled in a large, urban school district in the southwestern United States. Each set of samples, male/female, White/Hispanic, White/Black, and White/White, contained 800 examinees in the majority group and 200 in the minority group. In an attempt to control differences in ability that may have existed between the various population groups, examinees with scores greater or less than two standard deviations from their group's mean were eliminated. Ethnic samples contained equal numbers of each sex. The White/White sets of samples were utilized to provide baseline bias estimates because the tests could not logically be biased against these groups. Bias indices were then calculated for each set of samples with each of the three …

A Monte Carlo simulation technique was employed in this study to determine if the r transformation, a test of homogeneity of variance, affords adequate protection against Type I error over a range of equal sample sizes and number of groups when samples are obtained from normal and non-normal distributions. Additionally, this study sought to determine if the r transformation is more robust than Bartlett's chi-square to deviations from normality. Four populations were generated representing normal, uniform, symmetric leptokurtic, and skewed leptokurtic distributions. For each sample size (6, 12, 24, 48), number of groups (3, 4, 5, 7), and population distribution condition, the r transformation and Bartlett's chi-square were calculated. This procedure was replicated 1,000 times; the actual significance level was determined and compared to the nominal significance level of .05. On the basis of the analysis of the generated data, the following conclusions are drawn. First, the r transformation is generally robust to violations of normality when the size of the samples tested is twelve or larger. Second, in the instances where a significant difference occurred between the actual and nominal significance levels, the r transformation produced (a) conservative Type I error rates if the kurtosis of the parent population …