Executive Correspondence - Letter from Indianapolis, Indiana Mayor Bart Peterson to Chairman Principi regarding DFAS Indianapolis Indian.

Memorandum of Meeting with Georgia Congressional staff and community representatives regarding the top three reasons why Naval Air Station Atlanta should not be closed.

Coalition Correspondence – Letter dtd 07/08/2005 to Gary Dinsick from Frank Day for the Patriot’s Alliance concerning errata sheets for Fort Monmouth, NJ Community report.

Community Correspondence - Two letters from Florida resident Ryan Barton to members of the commission regarding the possible closure of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard and the adverse effects it could have on his relatives in New Hampshire and Southern Maine.

Community Correspondence - Three letters to the commission from concerned citizens opposed to the closure of Otis AFB.

Community Correspondence - Three letters with differing opinions on the relocation of people from White Sands Missile Range to Aberdeen Proving Grounds.

Collection of BRAC related news articles and clippings. Produced for COmmission staff review.

Community Correspondence - Letter from David A. Daberko supporting DFAS Cleveland.

Community Correspondence - Four letters from volunteer fire fighters in Delaware regarding the possible closure of New Castle Delaware Airport Guard Station.

Department of Defense Clearinghouse Response: DoD Clearinghouse response to a letter from the BRAC Commission regarding Detroit Arsenal's military value score.

Executive Correspondence – dtd 07/14/2005 to all Commissioners from Rep Diana Degette (1st CO) in support of the proposed recommendation to consolidate DFAS in Denver, CO.

Community Correspondence – to all BRAC Commissioners from George Kiernan assessing the Military value of DoD’s Ft. Monmouth Recommendations.

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: NAWS China Lake Overview for the BRAC Commission.

Regional hearing - 103-06 - RH6 - Statements and Testimony Regional Hearing - June 24, 2005 - Clovis, New Mexico BRAC Commission - FY 2005

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: System Support Activities.

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: Naval Air Warfare Weapons Division Overview.

Department of Defense Clearinghouse Response: DoD Clearinghouse response to a letter from the BRAC Commission requesting comment on maneuver training recommendation related topics (visit to Fort Benning).

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Resources.

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: NAVAIR China Lake Employment Profile.

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: EW Capability At NAVAIR Weapons Division China Lake.

Executive Correspondence – PowerPoint briefing of 07/10-11/05 forwarded to Commission R&A Analyst Lester Farrington from the Commander NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV China Lake. This is one of 7 Briefings and is entitled: NAWS China Lake Realignment Facilities Planning.

A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Plutonium is very hazardous to human health and the environment and requires extensive security because of its potential use in a nuclear weapon. The Department of Energy (DOE) stores about 50 metric tons of plutonium that is no longer needed by the United States for nuclear weapons. Some of this plutonium is contaminated metal, oxides, solutions, and residues remaining from the nuclear weapons production process. To improve security and reduce plutonium storage costs, DOE plans to establish enough storage capacity at its Savannah River Site (SRS) in the event it decides to consolidate its plutonium at SRS until it can be permanently disposed of in a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. GAO was asked to examine (1) the extent to which DOE can consolidate this plutonium at SRS and (2) SRS's capacity to monitor plutonium storage containers."

A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has focused attention on improving the academic achievement of all students, including more than 6 million students with disabilities and requires that all students be assessed. Students with disabilities may be included through accommodations, such as extended time, or alternate assessments, such as teacher observation of student performance. To provide information about the participation of students with disabilities in statewide assessments, GAO determined (1) the extent to which students with disabilities were included in statewide assessments; (2) what issues selected states faced in implementing alternate assessments; and (3) how the U.S. Department of Education (Education) supported states in their efforts to assess students with disabilities."

Testimony issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Improper payments are a longstanding, widespread, and significant problem in the federal government. The Congress enacted the Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA) of 2002 to address this issue. Fiscal year 2004 marked the first year that federal agencies governmentwide were required to report improper payment information under IPIA. One result of IPIA has been increased visibility over improper payments by requiring federal agencies to identify programs and activities susceptible to improper payments, estimate the amount of their improper payments, and report on the amount of and their actions to reduce their improper payments in their annual Performance and Accountability Reports (PAR). Because of your continued interest in addressing the governmentwide improper payments issue, you asked GAO to report on the progress being made by agencies in complying with certain requirements of IPIA. My testimony today summarizes the results of that work reported to you in March 2005. Ultimately, the success of this legislation hinges on each agency's diligence and commitment to identifying, estimating, and determining the causes of, then taking corrective actions, and measuring progress in reducing improper payments."