An experiment has been performed to determine the effect of motion of a thermal shield on the neutron signal expected from ex-core detectors. Using a mockup of the LWBR reactor vessel, thermal shield, and core barrel in conjunction with a /sup 252/Cf neutron source, the change in detector signal with displacement of the various components was investigated. It was found that moving the thermal shield would produce a significant change in detector signal, although the effect was smaller than would be produced by moving the source and core barrel together. The results were substantiated by two-dimensional discrete-ordinate calculations.

Fission gas release data are presented from 51 fuel rods irradiated as part of the LWBR irradiations test program. The fuel rods were Zircaloy-4 clad and contained ThO/sub 2/ or ThO/sub 2/-UO/sub 2/ fuel pellets, with UO/sub 2/ compositions ranging from 2.0 to 24.7 weight percent and fuel densities ranging from 77.8 to 98.7 percent of theoretical. Rod diameters ranged from 0.25 to 0.71 inches and fuel active lengths ranged from 3 to 84 inches. Peak linear power outputs ranged from 2 to 22 kw/ft for peak fuel burnups up to 56,000 MWD/MTM. Measured fission gas release was quite low, ranging from 0.1 to 5.2 percent. Fission gas release was higher at higher temperature and burnup and was lower at higher initial fuel density. No sensitivity to UO/sub 2/ composition was evidenced.

Pressure pulse tests were conducted with both solid and flexible test sections installed in a test vessel filled with room temperature water. A surge tank whose volume was approximately equal to that of the test vessel with the test section installed was connected to the test vessel by a /sup 1///sub 8/ inch I.D., 8 inch long surge line. Pressure pulses of magnitude up to 1275 psid and durations from 4.6 to 55.8 msec were generated in the test vessel with a drop hammer and piston pulse generator. FLASH-34 calculations show good agreement with the test data. In particular, FLASH-34 accurately predicts (a) the decrease in peak pressure and the increase in pulse duration due to the presence of a flexible test section, (b) the time delay between the occurrence of the pressure pulse in the test vessel and its arrival in the surge tank and (c) the magnitudes of the transient pressure differences between the test vessel and surge tank caused by the time delay. All of the structural responses were in the elastic range and were approximately quasi-static for the pulss tested. The test data versus calculation comparisons presented here provide preliminary qualification for FLASH-34 calculations of transient …