The National Museum of the Pacific War presents an oral interview with William Freeman. Freeman was born in Chapman, Kansas on 5 September 1922. Upon enlisting in the Army Air Corps in 1942, he was sent to Maxwell Air Force Base, Georgia for basic training. He tells the various training planes he flew prior to receiving his commission. Upon graduation he was sent to Ephrata Army Air Base, Washington where he began on the job training as the co-pilot of a B-17 bomber. Freeman recalls his various assignments until December 1943 when he reported to Cannon Army Air Base, Clovis, New Mexico for transitional training in the B-29 bomber. Upon completion of training he was assigned to the Air Transport Command and began flying planes to India. Following the Japanese surrender, he returned to the United States where he began flying weather mapping missions. This was followed by assignment in the Pacific where he flew geographical mapping missions. Freeman concludes the interview by telling of his life after being discharged in January 1948.

The National Museum of the Pacific War presents an interview with Donald Good. Mrs. Good assists with the interview. Good went into the Army in October 1941. He landed at Normandy with the 178th Signal Repair Company. He relates a few anecdotes about his time in Europe during the Normandy campaign and the Battle of the Bulge; he also saw some friends from home at random in Europe. He also recalls working closely with a unit of Moroccan soldiers. When the war ended, Good returned to the US and was discharged. He had some trouble adjusting to civilian life, but soon became readjusted.

The National Museum of the Pacific War presents an oral interview with Frederick Leiby. Leiby was born in Pennsylvania in 1923 and worked in a defense plant after finishing high school in 1941. in 1942, he passed the aviation cadet exam and was called up for active duty in January, 1943. He trained as a navigator at Selman Field, Louisiana for eight months before flying a new B-17 to North Africa. From there, Leiby went to Forge, Italy to join the 99th Bomb Group. He was shot down on his 39th mission and captured by the Germans in Italy in April 1944. In early 1945, Leiby was transfered to a POW camp near Nuremburg. From there, he was marched to Moosburg. During the march, he attempted escape, but was recaptured. After being liberated, Leiby returned to the US and attended an intelligence school. He also served in a military police unit in Massachusetts. He eventually attended Georgetown University and stayed in the inactive reserves. Leiby eventually made his way into the Foreign Service where he went to Vietnam.

The National Museum of the Pacific War presents an oral interview with Jack Schaefer. Schaefer was 11 years old when Pearl Harbor was attacked. While in high school, Schaefer worked part-time and contributed the entirety of his wages to the household. He accumulated war savings stamps, participated in bond drives, and collected scrap metal to support the war effort. His family supplemented their meat rations by raising rabbits. In 1950, he joined the Air Force, with a professional background in photography. He reported to the Wright-Patterson Motion Picture Department in Dayton, Ohio. In 1951, as part of a national effort to deploy combat camera teams worldwide, he was assigned to the newly formed Air Photographic and Charting Service and sent to Germany to conduct photographic surveillance of the occupation and rehabilitation of Europe. In 1957, he became a photographer for the DOD and the White House. During the course of his career, he filmed historic figures such as General de Gaulle and President Kennedy. In Vietnam, he couriered classified material into Saigon, receiving a Purple Heart after taking fragments from a grenade. Schaefer was then promoted to oversee all out-of-country photography and worked on the film, A Day in the …

Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "The radiofrequency spectrum is a natural resource used to provide an array of wireless communications services, such as mobile voice and data services, radio and television broadcasting, radar, and satellite-based services, which are critical to the U.S. economy and national security. Historically, concern about interference among users has been a driving force in the management of spectrum. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)--an independent agency that regulates spectrum use for nonfederal users, including commercial users--and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)--an agency within the Department of Commerce that regulates spectrum for federal government users--have worked to minimize interference through the "allocation" and "assignment" of spectrum. Allocation involves designating "bands" of spectrum for specific types of services or classes of users, such as designating certain bands for commercial use and others for government use. Assignment provides an authorization or license to use a specific portion of spectrum to entities, such as wireless companies. Demand for the radiofrequency spectrum has exploded over the past several decades as new technologies and services have been and continue to be brought to the market in the private sector and new mission needs unfold …

MEMORANDUM FOR Headquarters and Support Activities Joint Cross Service Group

ATTACHMENT TO VICE DIRECTOR, DLA, CERTIFICATION OF SCENARIO DATA CALL INPUT February 25, 2005 Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

Major Administrative and Headquarters Activities Caveats and Errata for Capacity Analysis including the entity, scope of the problem, and notes.

Copy of MAH Capacity Analysis 3 Feb 2005 (extract).xls

Capacity Questions (Based on Leased Space)Needed to construct the various listed Metrics

Capacity Questions (Based on Leased Space): Needed to construct the various listed Metrics:

HEADQUARTERS AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES JCSG INTEGRATED CAPACITY ANALYSIS PLAN (ICAP)

Target Activities - Inside DC Area: Footprint(GSF) including data on Leased/ Owned

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: Charter for the Joint Action Scenario Team (JAST) dated February 20, 2004.

INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT CAPACITY DATA CALL ANALYSIS PLAN (2nd Revision)Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE DATA REVIEW CERTIFICATION TO THE BRAC 2005 HEADQUARTERS AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES (H&SA) JOINT CROSS SERVICE GROUP (JCSG)- CERTIFICATION

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0050-a Intel JCSG Analysis within BRAC 05. Navy memo concurring with Initial Report of the Intelligence Joint Cross Service Group and recommends the establishment of a seventh Joint Cross Service Group to study common functions related to the intelligence community.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0050-b Intelligence JCSG Analysis. Navy memo dated October 31, 2003 concurring with Intelligence Joint Cross-Service Group Analysis recommendations as modified by the ISG on 10 Oct 2003.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0050-c Coordination of Int JCSG Analysis within BRAC 05. Memo dated November 21, 2003 regarding COORDINATION ON INTELLIGENCE JOINT CROSS-SERVICE GROUP (JCSG) ANALYSIS WITHIN BRAC 2005.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0061-a Coordination of BRAC05 Capacity Analysis questions dated December 18, 2003.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0065-a Manpower Support fo the JCSGs dated February 20, 2004. Contains related memos.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0065 Manpower Support for Joint Cross Service Groups dated December 17, 2003.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0067-a Analysis of Ranges During BRAC 2005 dated January 2, 2004. Memos from the Navy regarding ranges.

Disregard Restriction of Header and Footer: O-MM-0075-b Coordination on TJCSG Final Capacity Analysis Repo dated February 23, 2004. Coordination on Technical Joint Cross-Service Group (TJCSG) final capacity analysis report.