Texas Attorney General Opinion: JM-1035 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: JM-1035

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Jim Mattox, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Assessment of Capital Recovery Fees by the city of Houston against Texas A & M University for waste water services (RQ-1533)
Date: March 30, 1989
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: JM-1085 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: JM-1085

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Jim Mattox, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether taxes accrue against real property held in the Veterans' Land Fund after forfeiture in a contract of sale by the Veterans' Land Board (RQ-1697)
Date: August 9, 1989
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: JM-1130 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: JM-1130

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Jim Mattox, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Familial relationships as a disqualification for membership on the board of the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer Conservation District (RQ-1799)
Date: December 29, 1989
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
System: The Portal to Texas History
Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO89-31 (open access)

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO89-31

Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Jim Mattox, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Pursuant to Section 312.001, et seq., of the Local Taxation Code, entitled the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act, may one individual's property become a reinvestment zone without including contiguous or surrounding property that has identitcal or similar characteristics? Does the permitted purpose of under which a reinvesment zone may be designated still include the purpose of listed in subparagraph 7 of repealed Article 1066f, § 3(a), which purpose was to contribute to the expansion of primary employment or to attract major investment in the zone that would be a
Date: March 24, 1989
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
System: The Portal to Texas History