From Introduction: "The Seguin Quadrangle, Texas, was evaluated to a depth of 1500 m (5,000 ft) to identify geologic units and delineate areas that exhibit characteristics favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits. Each geologic environment was categorized as favorable, unfavorable, or unevaluated for uranium deposits, based on recognition criteria obtained from the study of significant uranium districts worldwide (Mickle and Matherws, eds.1978)."

Purpose and scope: The Eau Claire Quadrangle, Wisconsin and Minnesota, was evaluated to identify geologic units and delineate areas that exhibit characteristics favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits. All geologic environments to a depth of 1500 m (5,000 ft) were evaluated by means of surface investigations and available subsurface data. Each environment was categorized as favorable, unfavorable, or unevaluated for uranium deposits based on recognition criteria contained in the study of significant uranium districts worldwide (Mickle and Mathews, eds., 1978). Evaluation of the Eau Claire Quadrangle was conducted by Golder Associates, Inc., under subcontract to Bendix Field Engineering Corporation (BFEC), for the National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) program, managed by the Grand Junction Office of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The evaluation program began February 1, 1978, and ended February 1, 1980. Time spent by Golder personnel on literature search, field work, evaluation of data, and preparation of the final report totaled approximately 3.5 man-years.

Discussing test wells from the Williamsport Quadrangle

Discussing occurrences of uranium in the Williamsport Quadrangle

Discussing uranium occurrences in the Hamilton Quadrangle

Discussing sample locations and analyses

Discussing semiquantitative spectrographic analyses of Idaho Batholith and associated igneous rocks

Discussing chemical analyses from the Williamsport Quadrangle

A report regarding evaluations done of the Ashland Quadrangle to find favorability for uranium occurrences in the quadrangles geologic environments. "No favorable areas could be identified or delineated on the basis of available data, and it is concluded that geologic environments in the Ashland Quadrangle are unfavorable for uranium."

Report discussing lake-bottom sediment sampling; radon soil gas surveying, and chemical analyses for rock, stream-sediment, ground, spring-water, lake-water, and stream-water samples collected for a report discussing the favorability for uranium occurrences in geologic environments of the Ashland quadrangle of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota.

Discussing uranium occurrences in the Williamsport Quadrangle

Discussing sample locations and uranium analyses of Idaho Batholith and associated igneous rocks in the hamilton quadrangle

Discussing occurrences of uranium in the Hamilton Quadrangle

Discussing sample locations and uranium analyses of water samples in the Hamilton Quadrangle

This report follows the evaluation of uranium resources in the Ekalaka 1°x 2° Quadrangle, Montana and North and South Dakota to a depth of 1,500 m (5,000 ft) using available subsurface geologic information.

The following plates depict the geology of the Ekala quadrangle in Montana, North and South Dakota.