2 Questions pertaining to DON-0133 and the non-BRAC Senario (Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. Department of Defense Clearinghouse Response: DoD Clearinghouse reply to a letter from the BRAC Commission regarding 2 Questions pertaining to DON-0133 and the non-BRAC scenario (Portsmouth Naval Shipyard)

Question pertaining to DoN 15 and DoN 19. Department of Defense Clearinghouse Response: DoD Clearinghouse reply to a letter from the BRAC Commission regarding NAS New Orleans and MCRS Command.

Clearinghouse Response pertaining to 2 questions in regards to the ANG.

Response to 4 questions pertaining to net personnel, aircraft, milcon and schedule issues at Pope Air Force Base, NC

Executive Correspondence - The following three memoranda of law discuss possible legal and policy constraints on BRAC Commission action regarding certain base closure and realignment recommendations. The memoranda are not products of deliberation by the Commissioners and accordingly do not necessarily represent their views, or those of the Commission.

Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "In October 2002 we reported that inadequate linkage existed between near-term munitions needs of the combatant commanders and the purchases made by the military services. The Department of Defense (DOD) concurred with our recommendations and took steps to address them by rewriting the overarching DOD Instruction for determining munitions requirements. Related to our ongoing work on prepositioned stocks, we assessed whether DOD's efforts thus far and initiatives planned for the future will ensure the required linkage since successful implementation of operational war plans is contingent on the availability of the right mix and quantity of munitions. To make our assessment, we obtained and analyzed information from cognizant organizations within DOD, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), Headquarters and subordinate units of the Military Services, and U.S. Forces Korea (USFK). We conducted our analysis of DOD's munitions requirements process in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards."

Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "In May 2005, we issued our report expressing an opinion on the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) fiscal year 2004 financial statements and an opinion on SEC's internal control as of September 30, 2004. We also reported on the results of our tests of SEC's compliance with selected provisions of laws and regulations during fiscal year 2004. Our report on SEC's fiscal year 2004 financial statements identified reportable conditions in the internal controls over financial reporting that we considered to be material weaknesses. These weaknesses related to SEC's controls over (1) recording and reporting disgorgements and penalties, (2) information security, and (3) preparing financial statements and related disclosures. We issued two separate reports providing recommendations to address those weaknesses. The purpose of this report is to provide recommendations for those issues identified during our audit that, although not material in relation to the financial statements, we believe warrant management's attention."

Memorandum of Meeting at which Retired Navy Flag Officers gave personal views on the BRAC recommendations for Submarine Base New London and Naval Air Station Oceana.