Three memoranda of meetings from the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. The first two memoranda document meetings with the Naval Aviation Industrial Joint Cross-Service Group (I-JSG) regarding the Industrial Group’s proposal (IND 19) and the concepts used to evaluate capacity across all services. The third memorandum documents a meeting with military personnel regarding the Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC.

A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Over the years, the Department of Defense (DOD) has recorded billions of dollars of disbursements and collections in suspense accounts because the proper appropriation accounts could not be identified and charged. DOD has also been unable to resolve discrepancies between its and Treasury's records of checks issued by DOD. Because documentation that would allow for resolution of these payment recording problems could not be found after so many years, DOD requested and received legislative authority to write off certain aged suspense transactions and check payment differences. The conference report (H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 107-772) that accompanied the legislation (Pub. L. No. 107-314) required GAO to review and report on DOD's use of this write-off authority."

Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "This letter responds to a Congressional request concerning our April 2000 report, Early Education and Care: Overlap Indicates Need to Assess Crosscutting Programs (GAO/HEHS-00-78). Given the historical concern regarding the potential for program overlap among federal early childhood education and care programs, Congress asked that we update the list of programs providing or supporting education or care for children under the age of 5. The 2000 list included 69 programs, which were administered by 9 different agencies. To respond to the request, we replicated the keyword search from our 2000 report using the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA). After assessing the reliability of the CFDA, we determined it was suitable for our purposes. We obtained explanations regarding programs that were deleted from the CFDA. Our search yielded 254 programs, and we reviewed their descriptions to determine if they met three criteria: (1) directly funded or supported education and/or child care, (2) provided these services to children under age 5, and (3) delivered services in an educational or child care setting. Based on this review, we selected over 70 programs as potentially meeting these criteria and provided agencies …

A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "In 2003, GAO designated modernizing federal disability programs as a high-risk area requiring urgent attention and organizational transformation to ensure that programs function as efficiently and effectively as possible. GAO found that although social attitudes have changed and medical advancements afford greater opportunities for people with disabilities to work, the Social Security Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs have maintained an outmoded approach that equated disability with inability to work. We have prepared this report under the Comptroller General's authority as part of a continued effort to help policymakers better understand the extent of support provided by federal programs to people with disabilities and to assist them in determining how these programs could be better aligned to more effectively meet the needs of individuals with disabilities in the 21st century. This report identifies (1) the wide array of federal programs that serve people with disabilities, and (2) the major challenges these federal programs face in the 21st century. In addition, GAO presents factors policy makers and program administrators should address in assessing whether, and how, they could be transformed to better meet 21st century challenges."

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI: COBRA Program USAF

Memorandum of meeting with the H&SA Joint Cross-Service Group (JCSG) regarding the H&SA BRAC recommendations.

None

Executive Correspondence

Executive Correspondence

Executive Correspondence

Executive Correspondence

Onizuka Air Force Station, CA: Community Infrastructure Assessment USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

Executive Correspondence

Onizuka Air Force Station, CA: Environmental Impacts USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

Executive Correspondence

Schenectady County Airport Air Guard Station, NY: Community Infrastructure Assessment USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

Schenectady County Airport Air Guard Station, NY: Environmental Impact USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station, OH: One Pager USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station, OH: Mil Value and Capacity Supporting Information USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station, OH: COBRA Run USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI: COBRA Run USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI: Economic Impact (EIT Run) USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI: Community Infrastructure Assessment USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI: Environmental Impact USAF(Disregard Restriction Header and Footer)