Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Certain questions relating to the determination of the commencement of the term of office of members of various boards, agencies, commissions and committees of the State of Texas where such term of office is not specifically prescribed by statute or the Constitution of Texas.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether a county can sell property acquired for county road purposes but never used without the advertisement and sale at public auction as directed Article 1577, V.C.S.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the facts submitted constitute conflict of interest by members of Boards of Trustees of community centers who are interested in entities furnishing supplies or services to such centers.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether volunteer firemen operating an ambulence service as a regular operating portion of the Volunteer Fire Dept. are covered by Secs. 7, 8 and 12 of Article 6243e, V.C.S.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Effect of the order of the Commissioners' Court of Hardin County entered on March 24, 1969, on valuations on the county ad valorem tax rolls which had been finally approved by the Board of Equalization on January 22, 1969.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Construction of H.B. 1158, Acts of the 61st Legislature amending Section (9), Article 7.08, Title 122A, Taxation-General, relating to payment for cigarette stamps.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Construction of Article 4513, V.C.S., as amended by H.B. 358, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Regular Session, 1969

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether certain feeding demonstrations using white rats in which the diet of one group or rats is unbalanced constitutes the offense of curelty to animals, as defined by Article 182, Vernon's Civil Statutes and are experiments requiring compliance with said statutes.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the terms of the grand juries impaneled in the 8th Judicial District are concurrent with the District Court terms set forth in Art. 199, Subdiv 8, V. C. S., or with the District Court terms set forth in Art, 199, Subdiv. 62, V. C. S.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether, under the facts submitted, a County Judge is disqualified from presiding at condemnation trials and related questions.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: House Bill 84, Acts 61st. Leg, R. S. 1969, ch. 793, p. 2342, concerning right-of-way.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Question concerning the applicability of the Tort Claims Act (Acts 61st Leg., R. S. 1969, h. 292, p. 874.), to school districts.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether funds held in deposit by chain store for the purpose of paying its own money order type drafts but which drafts are not timely presented are subject to escheat laws.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Texas Board of Corrections must collect from public utilities a fair consideration for placing public utility lines on or across existing public roadways traversing State land under the control of the Department of Corrections, and related question.

Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification;Appointment of Deputy official shorthand reporter.